The Death of Anglo Influence

What is Going on in Germany, and is this the Waning of Anglo-American Influence?

German elite had been successfully colonized by English. English language, English thinking, English rhetoric, English sensitivity, English/American Political Correctness and simplifying political discourse. The result of this colonizing is obvious as are its goals — ever since the war with Napoleon — Great Britain’s ruling class had only one goal: to draw the wedge between Russia and all its potential allies.

Germany, Middle East, Far East. Wherever Russia is spreading its borders and trying to mix, mingle, and interact with its neighbors, expect to find a Brit, spying, intriguing, bribing, and brainwashing. Dividing and conquering, in other words.

It can be Persia of 1820s, or India, or Ottomans, or Germans, or Japan, or China.

You can be rest assured that an Oxbridge educated gentleman will be there. When Americans joined on the act and went out of their way to create and heat up the Cold War, they were simply following the bullet points drawn for them by the Churchill’s Empire.

The paradox, of course, is that Russia’s neighbors are neighbors for a reason. They share the climate, landscape, food, interests, and frequently blood. Brits, being cast out on the distant island in the middle of the Atlantic, have only two sets of neighbors, Irish and Scots. Ok, there are Welsh.

So hard as the Brits try, they can’t really control geography and culture for ever. Yes, there is Economist, BBC, Oxbridge and other instruments of brainwashing, but there is a reality on the ground.

It looks like more and more Germans are waking up from the delusion inspired by the opium-like stupor that British propaganda produces in its victims. Same thing applies to Slovaks, Hungarians, and even Czechs.

There is still a New Europe, i.e. Poles and Baltics, but potatoes, vodka and beets, let alone birch trees and sour cream, has its own pull.

Ultimately, German regional elections are not just a failure of Merz, Greens, and other products of British PR firms. It is the failure of the Brits, who are failing at home with the same speed they are failing abroad, Estonia notwithstanding.

Below is the copy of the article I’ve published ten years ago, in February of 2016. It was provoked by the hysterical response of NATO countries to Crimea reuniting with Russia. It is clear that the last ten years witness the triumph of British ruling class mindset over the rest of the world. Obviously, they are not done yet. With Russophobia waning, they are trying to resort to anti-semitism to continue to draw the hugely disillusion masses in. If we can’t lure Germans, Turks, or Saudis through animosity toward Russians, there are always Jews.

Technically, it is Israel, as technically, there was an animosity toward Soviet Union, but feeding it, are the age old phobias, and hatred of another. In any case, the writings were on the wall already in 2016. Now they are becoming more legible:

“The intention behind the conflict in Ukraine is to draw Europe, and especially Germany, away from Russia.

NATO was created, according to the well-known phrase, to keep America in, Russia out and Germany down.

Yet, geography is destiny. Russia and Germany are natural partners. They had enough wars between them to earn mutual respect. They have know-how and amazing resources; they have energy and reason, they share the ability to appreciate both community and individual.

What will happen if these two countries ally? The rest of the Europe will have to follow and form a very strong, powerful and — important to stress — natural block — capable of challenging if not dominating any other natural blocks — be they Asian or North American.

There is a catch. What lies between Russia and Germany are Ukraine and Poland, two countries that compete for the title of 52 and 53 states of America. Russophobic and nationalistic Ukraine, along with Russophobic Poland and the Baltic States, is the wedge to deflect the natural attraction of Russia and Germany towards each other.

The First Cold War was waged for the soul of Europe (cf. Frances Stonor Saunders study: “ The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters” 2000). Its target was not Russia proper but a number of European countries with very strong communist parties (embracing up to 40% of votes), who were pulling their countries, France and Italy in particular, toward Communist Russia. So endless amounts of funds were spent and a huge effort was made to drive a wedge between the Soviets and their potential European partners by convincing the Europeans that freedom of expression, abstract art, and jazz could flourish only in the west, and not in Soviet Russia.

It wasn’t difficult to win this war.

Ukraine lies at the forefront of the Second Cold War. Its purpose, once again, is to pull European countries away from Russia.

Russia’s harsh and inevitable response to the Ukrainian coup, was a God-sent event that continues to be milked to drive the lesson home of Russia’s unfitness for any sort of European alliance. Today’s Russians might listen to jazz or admire Jackson Pollock, but they can’t shed their penchant of aggression and barbarism.

Ukraine was destined to be the showcase through which the US would demonstrate its superiority not so much in the cultural sphere, but in the fields of democratic institutions, legality, and diplomacy, in order to prove to the Europeans, and the Germans in particular, of the need to pull away from Russia.

So far it has been working. However the outcome of this Second Cold War is much less predictable than the First. It is getting harder by the minute to prove the superiority of American democracy, diplomacy, and legality.

Rothko, Pollock, and Louis Armstrong could deliver Europe to the US. But can a murderous, right-wing Kiev regime coupled with the US’s reckless foreign policy be equally effective in convincing today’s Germans not to trust what their minds and their pocketbooks tell them?”